Skip to content
BIMpedia

Track geometry

The shape of a railway track in plan and profile, plus the cant between the rails, within tight tolerances: what designers set and maintainers keep.
2 min readUpdated 8 November 2026

Track geometry is the shape of a railway track: its horizontal alignment, its vertical profile, the gauge between the rails, and the cant (the height difference between the rails on curves). Designers set it, and maintainers measure and correct it throughout the railway's life, within tolerances of millimetres.

At a glance

HorizontalStraights, circular curves and transition curves
VerticalGrades and vertical curves
CantOuter rail raised on curves (superelevation)
GaugeDistance between the rails; 1,435 mm on standard gauge lines
TolerancesMillimetres for gauge, cant, line and level

The parameters

ParameterWhat it describes
RadiusHow tight a curve is
Transition lengthWhere curvature and cant change gradually
CantRail height difference on a curve
Cant deficiencyHow much more cant would balance a faster train
TwistChange of cant over a short length; limited for safety
GaugeDistance between the running edges of the rails

How it is used on projects

Track designers set the geometry to the line speed and the trains that use it; structures, platforms, overhead line equipment and signalling are designed around it. Clearances are checked against the space the moving train needs (the gauge profile or kinematic envelope), which depends on cant and curvature. In IFC 4.3, alignments carry cant, so models can position elements against the true track geometry.

In operation, track recording measures the geometry regularly and maintenance corrects faults before they exceed limits. Because tamping and renewals can move the track slightly within its allowances, as-built track positions should be resurveyed before new structures or equipment are designed close to it.

Variations

  • Gauges: standard (1,435 mm), broad and narrow gauges in various countries.
  • Ballasted and slab track, with different construction and maintenance tolerances.
  • Switches and crossings, where geometry is more complex.

Common mistakes

  • Clash-testing structures against the track centre line, not the kinematic envelope.
  • Ignoring cant when checking clearances on curves.
  • Mixing alignment revisions between track, structures and OLE teams.
  • Treating track geometry as fixed, when maintenance can move it within allowances.

Where to read more

The infrastructure manager's track design standards (for example national railway group standards); the European technical specifications for interoperability for European networks; and the IFC 4.3 documentation for rail alignments and cant.

Was this page useful?